Friday, 4 February 2011

Re: [jamia millia btech computer 07 batch] New photo

u gotta be kidding....right??....Java was initially designed for digital cable television industry and not for any any ES....Also...In today Java implementation for ES, it uses a virtual machine....and its upto the JVM to define the implementation of True....
Faizan Hasan 10:50pm Feb 4
u gotta be kidding....right??....Java was initially designed for digital cable television industry and not for any any ES....Also...In today Java implementation for ES, it uses a virtual machine....and its upto the JVM to define the implementation of True....
Comment History
Pervez Alam
Pervez Alam8:56am Feb 4
@RIZ: Bhai tune sahi kaha tha ki ye T-shirt banne wali nhi h, ab to me ADOBE ki T-shirt k piche apna aur sare classmates ka nam print karake kaam chalaunga.. lolz
Pervez Alam
Pervez Alam8:54am Feb 4
Hi Faizan, You are right about Java, but you should know that JAVA was initially designed for Embedded solution and most of that ES had 1-bit data-type available on ES-DS, so the 2's compplement becomes again 1(in one bit system) and it becomes 111111...11(in n bit system)

Again in 3rd post I told you that I was expecting a TRUE instead of 1,0 or == as I have seen you usually Program in JAVA. and if you want it readable (but not suitable for a T-Shirt quote) then write "always", much longer sentance..

and Sorry for late reply, actually I opens FB less then weekly..
Well Enjoy, Bye ;-)
GaRima SatSangi
GaRima SatSangi5:40am Jan 25
ali - u r so rite .. dey r bein borin .. :( :|
Syed Ali Rizvi
Syed Ali Rizvi2:22am Jan 25
Wow!!... i urge people who are going to appear for next company to go through this post. ;)
Faizan Hasan
Faizan Hasan10:31am Jan 24
Also....In JAVA...boolean variable do not take "1" as TRUE....if it is bit based....it is decided on 0 or 1 bit...if it is byte based...it takes the 2's complement of 1 as the TRUE value....
View All Comments
Original Post
Rizzwan Firdous
Rizzwan Firdous12:05am Jan 15

View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment